A criminal conviction can have the result of suspension, revocation, or denial of a real estate license in California. However, not all convictions will result in such disciplinary actions. A number of factors will be used by the California Real Estate Commissioner to determine if a suspension, revocation or denial is appropriate.
First, it must be determined if the circumstances of the crime are substantially related to the functions, qualifications, or duties of a real estate broker or salesperson. For example, a licensee convicted of vandalism for vandalizing a home he or she is attempting to sell is more likely to be disciplined than that same licensee breaking a window during a bar fight. The Commissioner will also consider the seriousness of the offense. Generally, convictions for the following crimes are considered substantially related and can result in discipline:
· any felony;
· theft, embezzlement, or fraud;
· intent or threat to commit significant harm to the person or property of another;
· any sex crime requiring registration pursuant to Penal Code Section 290;
· repeated conduct which shows a willful disregard for the law;
· contempt of court or willful disregard for a court order; and
· two or more convictions involving alcohol or drugs where at least one conviction involves driving and the consumption of alcohol or drugs.
The Commissioner will also consider the past criminal history of a licensee to determine if discipline is necessary. In addition, those holding a real estate broker license will be held to a higher standard than those holding a real estate salesperson license due to the higher level of self-regulation.
Usually the determination of whether discipline is necessary is made by an administrative hearing on a case by case basis, after the conclusion of the criminal case. At the hearing, a licensee may appear with an attorney and present evidence that the conduct was not substantially related to the licensee’s professional duties or mitigating the seriousness of the offense. However, if the licensee was convicted in the criminal court, they may not present evidence to attempt to prove he or she was not guilty.
The administrative hearing may also include an inquiry into the facts of a conviction beyond simply the plea or verdict. For example, a defendant may plead guilty to a lesser included offense that is not substantially related to his or her profession. However, if the circumstances surrounding the original charge are substantially related to his or her profession, the board may inquire regarding those facts in making a determination on whether to deny, revoke, or suspend a license.
It is also important to understand that an acquittal or dismissal of the criminal case will not bar subsequent administrative proceedings to suspend, revoke or deny a license. Even if you are found “not guilty” your license can still be taken away! This is because the “beyond a reasonable doubt” standard in criminal cases is higher than the “clear and convincing proof to a reasonable certainty” standard applicable to the administrative hearing. In the event of an acquittal or dismissal in criminal court, it is often wise for a licensee to petition the court for a finding of factual innocence under Penal Code 851.8 to prevent action against his or her professional license. In addition, a past conviction that has been expunged from a potential licensee’s criminal record can be used as a basis for denying an application for a license.
Because of the many ways in which a professional license can be suspended, revoked, or denied, any time a licensee is facing a potential criminal conviction it is wise to have the assistance of an attorney. Contact the Law Offices of Scott R. Ball today for a free and confidential evaluation of your case.
1/19/10
Effects of Traffic School in California
If you are convicted of a traffic offense, usually you are given the opportunity to attend traffic school. If you cannot fight the ticket and get it dismissed entirely, it is often a good idea to choose the traffic school option, although it will add about $100-$150 more to the total cost you will pay, in the form of court fees and the actual cost of the school. Successfully completing the eight hour traffic school will completely mask the ticket from your record. This means you do not receive a “point” from the DMV and your insurance company will never know you received a moving violation, meaning there will be no effect on your insurance.
Points are added to your record by the DMV to determine negligent drivers. One point is generally accumulated for most moving violations, such as speeding or running a stop light, or for at-fault accidents. Two points are assigned for more serious violations, such as DUI or hit and run. A driver may have his or her license suspended if they receive four points in one year, six points in two years, or eight points in three years.
You may only attend the eight hour traffic school once every 18 months. If you receive a second traffic ticket in that 18 month period, some courts may allow you to take the second offender traffic school, commonly referred to as the 12 hour class. The effects of taking this class are different from the initial traffic school class. Instead of completely masking your public record, the 12 hour class merely changes your record to reflect that the ticket was dismissed via traffic school. This will keep the point off your record for DMV purposes, but will still be visible to your insurance company. Legally, your current insurance company may not raise your rates because of that ticket. However, in actual practice, it is not difficult for a company to do just that by justifying a raise in any number of other ways. Further, any future policy you purchase with that same company or any other insurance company may justifiably have a higher premium due to the conviction.
While it is not uncommon for judges to offer the 12 hour class, it is completely within their discretion. Some judges regularly offer the option while others do not. Some will offer the option only if you do not request a trial. Traffic court is very informal and varies a great deal from one court to the next. Whether to request traffic school, or even whether to plead guilty, will vary greatly depending on each individual’s situation, including his or her previous record, the nature of the offense, and the tendencies of the presiding judge.
If you have been cited for a traffic ticket, it is often a good idea to contact an attorney to discuss your options. Contact the Law Offices of Scott R. Ball for a free and confidential evaluation of your case.
Points are added to your record by the DMV to determine negligent drivers. One point is generally accumulated for most moving violations, such as speeding or running a stop light, or for at-fault accidents. Two points are assigned for more serious violations, such as DUI or hit and run. A driver may have his or her license suspended if they receive four points in one year, six points in two years, or eight points in three years.
You may only attend the eight hour traffic school once every 18 months. If you receive a second traffic ticket in that 18 month period, some courts may allow you to take the second offender traffic school, commonly referred to as the 12 hour class. The effects of taking this class are different from the initial traffic school class. Instead of completely masking your public record, the 12 hour class merely changes your record to reflect that the ticket was dismissed via traffic school. This will keep the point off your record for DMV purposes, but will still be visible to your insurance company. Legally, your current insurance company may not raise your rates because of that ticket. However, in actual practice, it is not difficult for a company to do just that by justifying a raise in any number of other ways. Further, any future policy you purchase with that same company or any other insurance company may justifiably have a higher premium due to the conviction.
While it is not uncommon for judges to offer the 12 hour class, it is completely within their discretion. Some judges regularly offer the option while others do not. Some will offer the option only if you do not request a trial. Traffic court is very informal and varies a great deal from one court to the next. Whether to request traffic school, or even whether to plead guilty, will vary greatly depending on each individual’s situation, including his or her previous record, the nature of the offense, and the tendencies of the presiding judge.
If you have been cited for a traffic ticket, it is often a good idea to contact an attorney to discuss your options. Contact the Law Offices of Scott R. Ball for a free and confidential evaluation of your case.
1/15/10
The Difference Between Criminal and Civil Trials
When a person commits an act that is both illegal and causes financial harm to another, that person potentially exposes his or herself to both criminal and civil liability. This can result in two separate and distinct trials, which can have surprisingly different results.
The most famous case of dual criminal and civil trials happened in the mid ‘90s when O.J. Simpson was accused of murder. After O.J. was found not guilty at his criminal trial, the families of the victims brought suit in civil court alleging O.J. was liable for the wrongful death of Nicole Simpson and Ron Goldman. Despite the fact the jury in the criminal case returned a not guilty verdict, the jury in the civil case found O.J. liable for the deaths of the victims and ordered a payment of millions of dollars to the families.
Why the different result? Well, although both cases dealt with the same issue (did O.J. kill Simpson and Goldman?) there is a different standard of proof in criminal and civil trials. To be guilty of a criminal charge, the prosecution must show “beyond a reasonable doubt” that the defendant committed the act. This is the highest standard of proof in our legal system. However to be found liable in a civil suit, the plaintiff need only show a “preponderance of the evidence.” This means it is more likely than not that the defendant committed the alleged act. This is a much lower standard of proof. Therefore, although O.J.’s legal team was able to create a reasonable doubt in the minds of the criminal jury over whether he committed the murder, they were unable to convince the civil jury that it was more likely than not that he was not involved in the victim’s deaths.
As a result of the civil trial, O.J. was found liable financially for the deaths of Simpson and Goldman. Although he did not lose his freedom, he was ordered to make the families whole for the loss in the form of a payment, determined by the jury, of $33.5 million.
For almost any crime that involves a victim, there exists the possibility of an additional civil suit being brought as well. However, the vast majority of the time no civil suit is ever filed. There are several reasons for this. For one, punishment for many crimes include automatic restitution where a defendant found guilty must pay the victim for his or her loss. The main reason civil suits are uncommon, however, is the fact that most defendants simply don’t have the enough wealth to make a costly civil suit worthwhile.
If you have been charged with a crime, it is important to realize the possibility of a civil suit being brought against you, even if the criminal charges are dismissed or you are found not guilty at trial. Contact the Law Offices of Scott R. Ball for a confidential and free evaluation of your case.
The most famous case of dual criminal and civil trials happened in the mid ‘90s when O.J. Simpson was accused of murder. After O.J. was found not guilty at his criminal trial, the families of the victims brought suit in civil court alleging O.J. was liable for the wrongful death of Nicole Simpson and Ron Goldman. Despite the fact the jury in the criminal case returned a not guilty verdict, the jury in the civil case found O.J. liable for the deaths of the victims and ordered a payment of millions of dollars to the families.
Why the different result? Well, although both cases dealt with the same issue (did O.J. kill Simpson and Goldman?) there is a different standard of proof in criminal and civil trials. To be guilty of a criminal charge, the prosecution must show “beyond a reasonable doubt” that the defendant committed the act. This is the highest standard of proof in our legal system. However to be found liable in a civil suit, the plaintiff need only show a “preponderance of the evidence.” This means it is more likely than not that the defendant committed the alleged act. This is a much lower standard of proof. Therefore, although O.J.’s legal team was able to create a reasonable doubt in the minds of the criminal jury over whether he committed the murder, they were unable to convince the civil jury that it was more likely than not that he was not involved in the victim’s deaths.
As a result of the civil trial, O.J. was found liable financially for the deaths of Simpson and Goldman. Although he did not lose his freedom, he was ordered to make the families whole for the loss in the form of a payment, determined by the jury, of $33.5 million.
For almost any crime that involves a victim, there exists the possibility of an additional civil suit being brought as well. However, the vast majority of the time no civil suit is ever filed. There are several reasons for this. For one, punishment for many crimes include automatic restitution where a defendant found guilty must pay the victim for his or her loss. The main reason civil suits are uncommon, however, is the fact that most defendants simply don’t have the enough wealth to make a costly civil suit worthwhile.
If you have been charged with a crime, it is important to realize the possibility of a civil suit being brought against you, even if the criminal charges are dismissed or you are found not guilty at trial. Contact the Law Offices of Scott R. Ball for a confidential and free evaluation of your case.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
